From the U.K.’s The Independent:
“Brand promise is created by a name, especially where fragrance is concerned,” says James Craven of Les Senteurs, a specialist perfumery in Belgravia. “Scent itself is ethereal and almost subliminal, so good names are powerfully suggestive; do they conjure up an image or suggest emotional implications or attributes?”
For Craven, the best perfume names summon up a “story” to back up the scent; Guerlain’s Shalimar, for instance, with more than a hint of the Orient. Its name means “temple of love” in Sanskrit, and it was inspired by the Indian emperor Shah Jahan, who built the Shalimar garden in Lahore as a tribute to his wife (and went on to build the Taj Mahal as further homage after her death). Or the same company’s L’Heure Bleu, which, according to Craven, calls to mind “twilight, the reflective hour, when you meditate on transience and lost love.”
We agree. Any great brand name offers a great story, mining the stories, myths, and imagery we each learn at a young age.
Today’s perfume names often dispense with such poetic niceties and settle for “globally appropriate” haikus. These can be po-faced - Truth, Eternity, Angel - or vaguely transgressive - Opium, Addict, Higher, Crave. “Will we soon have Junkie by Cacharel or OD by Dior?” wonders Craven. “Names are chosen more by global branding marketers these days than by the perfumers themselves, which is why they’re becoming ‘edgier’ and, paradoxically, duller.”
But companies ignore “globally appropriate” names at their peril. Givenchy’s latest launch, a perfume named Ange ou Démon, is meant to invoke “the two sides of woman; the angel and the devil that lurk within”, to British ears, it sounds more like a chav-tastic couple named Ange and Damon.
Despite other shortcomings, Auge ou Démon is a two-sided, positive and negative name the Law of Negativity loves. As for another fragrance product name satisfying this theory, one of our laws of branding, the story continues:
Image-obsessed celebrities are usually too canny to fall into these traps when launching their own perfumes; Liz Taylor’s White Diamonds suggested opulence, while Britney Spears’s Curious certainly reflects her parenting techniques. But, while Alan Cumming’s image may be that of an omnisexual Puck, his Cumming: The Fragrance is perhaps a little too upfront. “It certainly conjures up an image,” says Craven, with some distaste, “but a rather unsavoury one.”
Learn more about Alan Cumming’s new business venture, by watching the commercial here.
[More posts about Brand Promise | More posts about Emotional Branding | More posts about Fragrance Branding | More posts about Perfume Branding | More posts about Alan Cumming | More blogs about Fragrance Branding]