brand strategy consultants

category: Consumer Electronics

Great Branding By Truth Telling

We are fans of Trust Matters, the respected blog hosted by Charles Green of Trusted Advisor fame.

A Trust Matters commentary, Great Selling By Truth Telling: A Best Buy Tale, should be required reading for those who think branding is simply “advanced” advertising, a stereotype captured in this quote:

[S]ome people feel this is a sucker’s game. It’s sales right? The point isn’t to tell the truth, it’s to not get caught not telling the truth? To look like you’re telling the truth, not to actually tell it.

Market research reveals some 75 percent of Americans disbelieve and distrust advertising.

As Charles Green frames it:

Telling the truth is not stupid, wussy, or bad business. Far from it. It’s very good business.

We agree. Telling the truth — authenticity — is one requirement of effective branding.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Branding vs Advertising]

The Circuit City Brand Disconnect

Brand strategy is business strategy, yet examples abound of Fortune 500 CEOs unable to grasp this simple truth.

CircuitCityLogoIf an interview in The Wall Street Journal is any indicator, the latest demonstration of this inability to grasp the obvious comes from the Chief Executive of Circuit City Stores Inc.

Too often the new CEO of an under-performing company focuses first on cost-cutting rather than revenue growth. The reason is that cost-cutting is easier than increasing sales. A cost-cutting plan may also be more quickly implemented, telegraphing “action” to a quarterly-focused Wall Street.

In contrast, developing a plan to build sales while increasing margin is more difficult, and more time consuming. It requires the CEO to ponder why their organization and products matter in a competitive marketplace.

To effectively drive sales, the CEO and his/her team must be able to define why they are, so that they become the only logical choice for what they offer. For many an otherwise certified smart CEO, it is a counterintuitive task at which many languish and even fail.

In the Wall Street Journal Q&A with Circuit City’s CEO, Philip J. Schoonover offers this:

WSJ: How is Circuit City’s multichannel approach — store, Internet and call centers — any different from the approach of its two bigger rivals, Best Buy and Wal-Mart Stores Inc.?

Mr. Schoonover: We have a culture that is beginning to cooperate and work together to provide a customer experience that is different and better. One example is our 24/24 promise. Order online, and we’ll have your purchase ready for you at a store in 24 minutes. If not, we’ll give you a $24 gift card. Our technology is unique and allows us to make that promise. Another is content. We have product reviews by leading consumer magazines. We have a whole explanation on what you need to make this new digital entertainment world work.

Mr. Schoonover claims Circuit City is different by being “unique” and, well, “different.” Instead, he would do well to look at the recent experience of another CEO who failed to understand the importance of articulating a simple brand promise demonstrating a memorable point of difference, and the predictable result.

The story of Paul Pressler’s reign at The Gap offers a cautionary tale of what happens when a CEO fails to think of brand strategy as business strategy. It is a lesson best illustrated by the backstory of Mr. Pressler’s failed development of a new Gap Inc. retail concept, Forth & Towne:

Gap designed Forth & Towne to offer baby boomers a miniature version of the department stores they grew up with, stocking four different labels under one roof…

Forth & Towne, or F.A.T, …never developed an engaging story to support the concept. And it never settled upon a single point of difference to set it apart from competitors. Forth & Towne tried to be too much for too many audiences.

How did this happen?

In a stunning display of corporate homogeneity, the suits at The Gap failed to articulate a simple guiding promise for the new brand, as demonstrated by how they settled upon a name for the new concept which offered no clue of a reason to care about it. The team at Gap Inc. thought they were playing it safe, when instead their decision had the effect of issuing an execution order for the new concept before it was launched.

Circuit City’s CEO makes the same mistake, as he fails to articulate what about Circuit City is truly different when compared to competitors such as Best Buy, Costco, and Wal-Mart. By speaking in platitudes, Mr. Schoonover fails to demonstrate why Circuit City exists, so that they become the only logical choice for what they offer.

This failure to focus on brand has been devastating.

Mr. Schoonover became CEO at Circuit City in March of 2006. Three months later Circuit City shares traded at a high of $30.49. Since then the stock has fallen to $4.95 per share at market close on February 12, 2008, a decline of 83% in some 20 months.

Yet a turnaround could be achieved with an effective rethink of the Circuit City brand.

But that takes guts, and appropriate leadership.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Retail Branding]

More Zombie Brands

We recently discussed the topics of resurrected dormant brands, otherwise labeled Zombie Brands, and their value due to latent brand equity.

Indian motorcycleA follow-up story appears at the online magazine Slate, speaking to revived brands such as the Indian Motorcycle, the McDonald’s McRib sandwich, Polaroid recast as a flat panel TV brand, and the MG motor car.

Read more about similar dormant brands here.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Rehab]

Nokia Dumps Umbrella Branding

Nokia 6600According to the India Times, one mobile phone manufacturer wants to drop their umbrella brand strategy in naming it’s products:

What’s in a name? Ask Nokia. After the roaring success of the Moto[rola] RAZR, PEBL, SLVR and ROKR series, the Finnish mobile handset manufacturer feels that consumers find names easy to remember compared to the usual mundane numbers.

…[B]arring few exceptions , numbers have been the only way its phones have been branded so far. Remember [the] 1100, 2600, 3310, 6020?

…Nokia global marketing head Keith Pardy [recently] said: What you will see coming from us in the future is not just a numbering system, you are going to start to see names that carry a meaning and are important to consumers.

Perhaps Nokia’s problem has little to do with the use of numbers, and more to do with the use of a naming architecture that makes little intuitive sense and worse, offers no human connection to Nokia product.

To do it right, Nokia could have taken a lesson or 6,620 from others who know how to do numbers naming correctly, such as this company.

Here’s a partial list of Nokia product names. Compelling stuff, if one is a product engineer:

1100
1101
1108
1110

1220
1221
1260
1261
1600
1610
1611
1620
1630
1631

2010
2100
2110
2110i
2112
2115
2115i
2116i
2118
2125i
2126i
2128i
2160
2160i
2170
2180
2190
2220
2255
2260
2270
2280
2285
2300
2600
2650
2651
2652

3100
3105
3108
3110
3120
3125
3128
3152
3155
3200
3205
3210
3220
3230
3250
3280
3285
3300
3310
3315
3320
3330
3350
3360
3390
3395
3410
3510
3510i
3520
3530
3560
3570
3585
3585i
3586i
3587i
3588i
3589i
3590
3595
3600
3610
3620
3650
3660
3810

5100
5110
5120
5125
5130
5140
5140i
5160
5165
5170
5170i
5180i
5185i
5190
5210
5500
5510

6010
6011i
6012
6015
6015i
6016i
6019i
6020
6021
6030
6060
6090
6100
6101
6102
6102i
6103
6108
6110
6111
6120
6125
6126
6130
6131
6133
6136
6138
6150
6155
6155i
6160
6170
6185
6190
6200
6210
6215i
6220
6225
6230
6230i
6233
6234
6235
6235i
6250
6255i
6256i
6260
6265
6270
6280
6310
6310i
6340
6340i
6360
6370
6385
6500
6510
6560
6585
6590
6590i
6600
6610
6610i
6620
6630
6650
6651
6670
6680
6681
6682
6800
6810
6820
6822

7160
7190
7200
7210
7250
7250i
7260
7270
7280
7360
7370
7373
7380
7390
7600
7610
7650

8110
8148
8210
8250
8260
8265
8265i
8270
8280
8290
8310
8390
8800
8801
8810
8850
8855
8860
8890
8910
8910i

9000
9000i
9110
9110i
9210
9210i
9290
9300
9300i
9500

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Umbrella Branding]

Asia Mid-Cap Sees Brand Strategy As Crucial to Growth

Aigo logoGood brand strategy is good business strategy.

One Chinese company understands this fact as it prepares to expand their presence in global markets, as seen in this story from Electronic Engineering Times Asia:

By global standards, the only thing truly big about Beijing Huaqi Information Digital Technology Co. is its name. Nevertheless, it has big plans. Like dozens of companies across Asia, Huaqi aspires to follow in the footsteps of regional giants like Sony and Samsung to be a household name with cutting-edge technology.

That’s the dream. The reality: Huaqi is a PC peripherals and consumer electronics company that does a little more than $300 million a year in revenue. Outside of China, it is unknown. Its most popular product lines are low-margin MP3 players and USB flash drives. It faces tough competition at home and a steep learning curve abroad.

But Huaqi, like other wannabe giants in Asia, has some of the ingredients to make a run: a low-cost manufacturing base, a growing emphasis on R&D and a newfound respect for building a worldwide brand.

Too often companies are slow to grasp that an organization’s most valuable asset is it’s brand. In contrast, by grasping the strategic importance of brand development, Huaqi is off to a promising start.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Global Branding]


« Home | Consumer Electronics