brand strategy consultants

category: Brand Positioning

Whisper | A Brand Demonstration

We are often asked of the origin of our name.

Whisper is our brand name, the name of our company, a reflection of our brand promise and a demonstration of effective branding.

The story behind the creation of our own brand demonstrates how we think of brand opportunities faced by most any organization and more importantly how, by turning to us, an organization may solve them.

Whisper was created to assist and guide companies through what are often complex issues of brand evaluation, brand creation and brand deployment.

In addition to the usual struggles of getting the positioning pitch perfect—the marketing industry is so large and the lines between advertising, public relations, graphic design, and branding are so often blurred, we knew finding a “between-the-eyes” audience connection would be vexing.

We relied upon storytelling.

The 5-Second Story

The key was to develop an entry point into the minds of those we seek to attract and influence—an effective 5-second story—to prompt a mental stop allowing further engagement in a real conversation about their needs and how we would address them.

Our 5-second story had to instantly induce our audience to pause and internalize the story, prompting a desire to “pay” to hear more—literally “paying” when they pay attention, paying with their time and mental effort.

Whatever our 5-second story might be, it had to offer something new and authentic, a never heard before narrative. Ours had to offer the equivalent of electric shock therapy to snap preconceptions about the discipline of branding, providing a now we’re paying attention moment for our firm to frame itself. Because such preconceptions are strong and not easily brushed aside, the audience needs to come away questioning their assumptions, their stereotypes, as if to say, “THIS is branding? Wow, I had no idea.”

Playing By The Rules

Our story had to demonstrate how to successfully play by the rules.

World class brand strategy honors certain inalienable rules. These rules, or Laws of Branding, cannot be ignored or dismissed IF a brand creation exercise is to be successful.

Ignore the Laws of Branding, and any so-called “branding effort” devolves into a far more expensive advertising campaign of little long term effect.

It is one thing to advocate certain laws, and not follow them. Our brand had to demonstrate how an adherence to the rules, through an effective process discipline, creates a successful brand.

Positioning, Positioning, Positioning

Whether creating a new brand or rebranding an established one, a branding project is really a positioning project—first develop the brand positioning, then name that positioning. Since branding is about demonstrating ideas and advertising is about explaining them, we needed a market position that demonstrated rather than explained the Why of our firm. The brand name also had to work on a multinational, cross-cultural basis.

The best means of engaging a consumer is through a one-on-one communication. It’s intimate. It’s personal.

Getting inside the head of your consumer is the objective. This personalized intimacy is far more credible and effective than any mass media in building a long-term relationship.

To drive this engagement, great brand positioning results in a tip-of-the-spear name and often tagline, the crucial first point of audience contact for any organization, product, or place.

Smarter than Advertising

Our business objective was to develop a brand position leading to a name and tagline driving awareness—without the support of advertising dollars. We were, after all, a start-up business. As with any entrepreneurial venture, we had to make every dollar count.

Our brand had to open a window into the minds of organization decision-makers we seek to influence, who when finding us on the Internet or by word-of-mouth are moved to ask for more about us and how we work.

A brand position demonstrating an intuitive reason to learn more about us would tap into stories and layers of imagery existing within the human mind.

Branding Is Competitive Sport

We developed a competitive analysis, necessary to understand the competitive context of any brand. What names and key messages are owned by competitors, and how effective are they?

While many firms say they offer branding services, their brand names and key messages do not demonstrate storytelling expertise.

For example, consider firms with names such as Wolff Olins, Landor, Prophet, MarketShare Partners, Brandtrust, GSD&M, Interbrand, or FutureBrand. What do those names convey? Is it:

    • A law firm?
    • Cigarette?
    • Venture capital group?
    • Alphabet soup?
    • Trucking company?
    • An indefinite time forever unreachable, a promise forever unfulfilled?

Each name misses the tip-of-the-spear opportunity to demonstrate competitive difference, and must be explained before understanding the “why” of the organization the name represents.

None map back into the fundamental basis for the existence of the branding discipline—communication.

Naming Narcissism

There is another, often counterintuitive, consideration. A brand name should turn the focus away from the organization or product it represents, and instead serve as an introduction to the benefit a customer may receive.

Rather than a chest thumping brand name blaring “Me, Me, Me”—for example, a founder’s last name, or a presumptively self-flattering capability such as Prophet—a name should intuitively tap into a benefit of significance to the intended audience.

The principle is basic to human behavior and response. For example, at a social gathering one creates far more goodwill by speaking in terms of interest to others, rather than the tiresome bore who speaks constantly of himself.

Building the Customer Relationship

As our competitive analysis revealed, no brand consultancy had yet developed a self-propelling evocative brand name. This result pointed to our market opportunity, further defined as assisting clients in thinking of brand as an asset rather than expense, and brand development as a powerful and cost-efficient customer relationship tool.

Like many others in our business, the intellectually lazy way out of naming ourselves would have been to use the last names of our founding partners — Cranford, Manning & Jurisch — or by an acronym such as CMJ. However, founder-based brand names are chosen primarily to stroke the egos of the founders, and demonstrate a complete lack of strategic thought.

We might also have chosen a functional name such as BusinessBrand, invented name such BrandFly, non-English name such as Sermo (Latin for conversation), or an experiential name such as CompetitiveAdvantage Partners. However, whether a functional, invented or experiential brand name, none offer the self-propelling emotional imagery and narrative creating natural, and inevitable, human engagement.

When the human mind discovers an instinctive solution properly labeled, the discovery serves as a prompt for the mind to stop, lean forward, examine closely, and seek more information. Accomplish this, and a brand name shows up daily and goes to work without advertising.

Breakthrough

Rather than positioning our brand with a built-in need to explain our relevancy, we zeroed in on this thought, “The key to any effective marketing or branding effort is to change and take ownership of the conversation.”

Marketing today is often little more than the equivalent of shouting on a street corner, with the shouters believing the loudest win. When you shout, people tune you out.

In a culture saturated with messages being screamed at consumers from every direction, employing superlatives like “best”, “number one”, “leading”, “favorite”, “great”, “unique”, and so on, it’s no wonder that people have evolved highly sensitive and effective BS indicators.

When you whisper, on the other hand, people are forced to pay attention, to lean forward, to become engaged. To whisper is to exchange valuable, privileged information, to communicate intimately, emotionally and strategically, and to make yourself heard as human rather than as a product, all without yelling yourself hoarse.

Competitive Separation

Branding must create long-term competitive advantage to increase market share. Otherwise, what’s the point?

Our process pointed to a brand position that could get us inside the mind of our target audience and keep us there. This position would demonstrate a different mindset and approach, and tap into a wealth of existing imagery. It would penetrate the human mind by successfully navigating the white noise of marketing industry self-promotion, and frame the answer to “Why we exist” as one of personal one-on-one immediacy.

Following the same process we use with clients, we had no choice but to name our company Whisper. The name moves across borders easily, creating engagement whether in the United Arab Emirates, or the United States. And because our positioning is all about looking at branding as balance sheet asset creation, by changing and taking ownership of the market conversation to grow market share, it became obvious our tagline should be Own The Conversation.

One of the most important accomplishments of the best brands is being thought of as greater than the functional goods and services offered. “Nike - Just Do It” helps the company rise above selling sneakers. “Apple - Think Different” taps into far more than computers. “Las Vegas - What Happens Here, Stays Here” is bigger than a vacation destination.

These breakthroughs lead to a transactional narrative where the organization, product, or place speaks for itself.

As for Whisper, we don’t think there’s a better name out there demonstrating branding thought leadership.

And that’s our story.

It’s a strategy validated many times since by, among others, this futurist and author.

Turning To You

You should always have the highest expectations for your brand, and the story you share.

When looking for a partner to assist in developing your own brand, and the best means to attract the audience you seek to engage, ask yourself:

How did the firm I am considering brand themselves?

The insight gained from the answer will prove invaluable, IF you are unwilling to settle for incrementalism for building the reputation of your organization, and if you seek the fullest development of your brand assets and the opportunity to grow market share.

Let’s talk about your story, and how to own the conversation within your industry.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Naming]

Branding Wisdom From Malaysia

According to K.C. Tan, managing director of Signature International, having a strong brand has everything to do with a company’s success:

“When you invest in branding, you invest in the future of your business. I firmly believe that business success and brand strategy go hand in hand.”

We agree.

Effective branding and business success are inseparable.

You can read more about Mr. Tan’s company and his thoughts on brand positioning and business success in The Star from Malaysia.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Success]

How To Own The Conversation Through Branding

A demonstration of how to own the conversation® within a business category, by exuding an engaging brand personality in alignment with a well thought out brand strategy:


[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Personality]

Havaianas: A Demonstration of Successful Rebranding

Guest blogged by Monica Sabino of Brandgame.

When traveling abroad and sharing with others you are Brazilian, there is immediate association with samba, soccer and the iconic soccer star, Pelé. In the last few years, one more word was added to this list – Havaianas (pronounced ah-vai-YAH-nas).

HavaianasLogoIt is particularly interesting that this brand has been added to the collection of positive words that describe Brazil, because when I was a child, in São Paulo, one of the worst things that could happen to you in terms of popularity was to be seen in Havaianas. Wearing Havaianas was a sign your family was a victim of the recession or the mass layoffs happening in the industry at that time – you were officially typecast as “poor.” Only financially challenged children would use these 5-dollar flip-flops launched in 1962, that yes, were extremely comfortable, but also completely un-cool.

In 1994, however, Havaianas started a journey towards granting every Brazilian consumer permission to wear them — “affordable” could be turned into “democratic and informal.” Havaianas offered a very clean design, a simplicity that was almost sexy. Why not put it on the feet of all Brazilians, those walking on the street but dreaming of the beach? Creating an instant vacation.

HavaianasDesignWhat seemed at first aspirational became the Havaianas brand strategy. A brand for all. Comfortable meeting cool. An instant benefit by haloing the wearer as upscale and chic. And, according to the company’s U.S. site, the name Havaianas itself, Portuguese for Hawaiians, was a tribute to America’s glamorous holiday destination.

Product was redesigned. The original two-colored version received a line extension called Havaianas Top, with a single color distributed in new channels, to reach new audiences. Product display was changed; the bowls where the brand had been found in the past in retail locations were substituted by nice displays where each of the different colors could be seen.

In the years that followed the brand moved relentlessly towards the new strategy, at every contact point and with consistent execution. Colors, design, distribution, communication, everything was about fun, relaxation, and simplicity.

Different celebrities were photographed in their Havaianas, caught in relaxed moments. And although, according to the company, advertising spends remained the same, this shift in brand strategy brought the brand to unprecedented levels of success and to substantial imports as the brand carries all colorful qualities of Brazil.

What was unimaginable 13 years ago has become reality; the low-end commodity footwear has become a must-have fashion accessory. Havaianas now offers product for daily wear, and chic designs that are worn for an evening out.

Today wearing Havaianas is actually desirable. What was once a cheap flip-flop product have instead became shoes for those moments when you don’t need and don’t want to worry.

The commodity has been transformed to a brand.

As a Brazilian, it is nice to be associated with beautiful beaches, samba, good soccer… and a brand such as Havaianas!

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Retail Branding]

Muji: A Brand Demonstration of Simplicity

Muji has opened in the United States.

MujiLogoSoho in New York City to be precise.

The Muji brand promise is simple. Literally, simple:

Because there is complexity in purity.
Elegance in plainness.
Intricacy in streamlining.
Richness in reduction.
Depth in minimalism.
Surprise in uniformity.
Innovation in re-use.
Cool in the avoidance of cool.
And there is true sophistication in simplicity.

Our friend in Europe tipped us to this story of Muji’s arrival:

Muji contends that design needn’t announce itself—rather, it can become apparent to you through use, over time… The company’s discretion—almost unheard of in the industry—reflects Muji’s dogged determination to reduce a product to its essence.

Muji offers a powerful demonstration of how the principle of simplicity works in attracting a consumer audience.

Muji’s brand promise is in the tradition of one developed centuries ago by a brand strategy thinker ahead of his time:

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Retail Branding]

Brand Strategy IS Business Strategy - A Second Opinion

Brand strategy is business strategy, or so this startling (to some) opinion was offered in this column.

Another voice now offers the same opinion in a column titled Marketers Can’t Afford To Promise and Then Not Deliver:

A brand is not a graphic design. It is—I should say it must be—a business strategy. But so often, if the strategy was ever there (as it truly was at FedEx and Starbucks), it gets lost in the idea that a whammo ad campaign can carry the company, can take the place of the promise.

Read more in this from Brandweek.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Strategy]

Would You Hire a Branding Company Unable to Brand Itself?

Unfortunately, many organizations do. Those making the agency hiring decision often overlook a common sense test of a branding company’s branding skills raised by this question:

“Tell us, how did you brand yourself, and how does your own name and branding demonstrate your ability to help us with ours?”

The latest branding company to fail in rebranding themselves is the topic of this story in Advertising Age.

BrandUnion logo2The agency? Formerly Enterprise IG, now The Brand Union, positioning themselves as full of brand mastery with this new logo.

The new brand name and positioning becomes instantly anonymous among other branding companies with these blindingly similar names:

Brand-DNA (.com)
Brand-DNA (.net)
DNA Brand Mechanics
Brand 2.0
BrandActive
Brand Doctors
Brand Equity
Brand Evolve
Brand Fidelity
Brand Institute
Brand Mechanics
BrandForward
Brandico
Brandjuice Consulting
BrandLadder
BrandLink
BrandLogic
BrandMaverick
BrandPeople
Brandscope
Brandslinger
BrandSolutions
Brandtrust

And these:

Absolute Brand
Building Brands
Core Brand
Futurebrand
Independent Branding
Interbrand
Not Just Any Branding
Real Branding
Spherical Branding
The Branding Iron
The Brand Consultancy
The BrandRanch
The Brand Union
TradingBrands
The Better Branding Company

There is an easy tip-off of why the new “The Brand Union” name and position are failures before they begin. If the word brand is used in the name and positioning of a so-called branding company, the company demonstrates an unwillingness to differentiate itself from brand company competitors. If undifferentiated from the competition, a brand devolves into little more than an anonymous commodity — the worst possible outcome for any brand.

One executive with The Brand Union explains the change this way:

“It suggested strength through the organization and common goals. It was a clear identifier — especially coming from Enterprise IG, where there was a lot of ‘What do they do?’”

An executive with The Brand Union’s parent offers a revealing look into how this branding company thinks:

The relaunch will help the company be more competitive in the marketplace, where his research suggests that potential clients turned to rivals such as FutureBrand and Interbrand due to their more-appropriate corporate names.

There is a lesson in this beyond poking fun at a competitor. The message to potential corporate clients anywhere is if you want what seems safe, yet is bland and instantly forgettable, hire The Brand Union or any of the homogeneous branding companies identified above.

However, if unafraid to explore what works in creating a game changing company or product name, check out this from our sister naming group, Igor, and give us a call.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Naming]

The Czech Republic: Elevating the Brand Without A Sermon

The Czech Republic brand opportunity was previously discussed here.

So when tipped to a column addressing the same topic we read it with interest. The author makes this point about destination brand efforts and why they so often fail:

CzechRepublicLogoSadly, last year’s attempt at designing a logo and strapline based on speech bubbles to reflect the many facets of Czech life, is typical of many misplaced place branding efforts - trying to satisfy all stakeholders but failing to capture and dominate a single market segment.

We agree. If a brand attempts to satisfy everyone, it stands for nothing.

The same column further suggests a unique characteristic of Czech life that could be mined to competitively separate the Czech Republic from other nation brands:

The other area of promise can also be found throughout the country, but it is in the capital city - Prague - where the cultural contradiction is most visible… Prague’s skyline - dominated by some 200 Church spires - yet at ground level, over half its population claim to be Atheists.

As reprinted in The Age, in 2003 the Los Angeles Times looked at the state of religion in the Czech Republic, finding:

Recalcitrant and suspicious, Czechs are not entirely godless. They just don’t care for organised religion…

There’s a hostility toward what religion did to them in the past… The Czechs say they’re the most atheist country in Europe, and they say it with some pride. This is how Western civilization may look in 50 years, because people here believe they live a full life without any religion.

If a country were looking to change the conversation about itself to that of an unforgettable place, few would engender more emotion than to stand as the place of no religion. Such a brand position would tap into a ready made global market of approximately 15% of the world’s population, or some one billion people of secular/nonreligious belief.

As with any effective brand position, you must give up something to gain market share. Its part of an own the conversation® strategy. By acknowledging, for example, that John 3:16 believers are not a target market, a brand promise based on a core idea such as “where spirituality lives without religion,” would offer competitive separation and a unique entry point for engagement of a sizable slice of the global tourism market.

Such a promise is a provocation. To qualify as a provocation, a brand promise must contain what most would refer to as negative messages for the goods and services the brand represents.

Fortunately, consumers process these negative messages positively. As long as the message authentically maps to one of the positioning points of your brand, consumers rarely take the meaning literally, and the negative aspects of the message give it greater depth, creating a greater opportunity for audience attraction, engagement and ultimately conversion.

For the Czech Republic, such a promise would change the conversation to a basis the Czech Republic could easily claim, own and extend on a global basis. For example, use of such a brand strategy could ensure massive free media coverage, if managed properly on an evergreen basis. And, it would further elevate tourism as an economic driver in the Czech Republic.

While not a strategy the evangelical or fundamentalist believer would embrace, for those charged with the success of Czech Republic tourism, such a brand demonstration would be the answer to a prayer.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Destination Branding]

Brand Strategy IS Business Strategy

TalbotsLogoIf there were any doubt that brand strategy is business strategy, one need only read the this report discussing the strategic review underway at U.S. based Talbots, to sharpen its brand and ensure that the women’s clothing and specialty retailer remains “relevant, fresh and consistent.”

According to the Talbots CEO:

The goal of the review is to provide a comprehensive plan to improve profitability and improve business performance… [The review will include] operating matters, store growth, productivity, noncore concepts and distribution channels.

For Talbots, more than a logo or slogan at play here.

To assure success, hopefully Talbots selected a pure brand strategy consultancy which comes to the task with brand as the primary focus, rather than as an afterthought.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Retail Branding]

Find Your Brand by Owning A Word

Own one word.

So you want to be a recognized, perhaps even global brand? John Quelch, Senior Dean of the Harvard Business School, offered this advice while speaking earlier this month in Singapore:

“If you can own an important word globally, it is the best way to create a global brand.”

Dean Quelch pointed to Google as an example:

Why did Google become the most valuable brand in the world? Quelch asked. Because it had an ambitious mission – to organise the world’s information; search is important; and Google is simply better than its competitors.

BisikWhisperMalay…Google owned one word – search. “If you can own an important word globally, it is the best way to create a global brand.”

It seems so simple. In any language, including Malay. Even Leonardo da Vinci would agree.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Simplicity]

Honda Automotive Brand = Safety?

Honda logoHonda wants to own the safety position within the automotive industry. Only one problem with this strategy; the position has been owned for decades by a competitor.

According to the New York Times:

From the time it started selling cars in the United States 35 years ago, Honda has fostered a reputation for building fuel-efficient vehicles.

Now it is taking a new tack: it wants to join Volvo as an automaker best known for safety.

To get there, Honda is promoting safety as a key part of its public image…

Volvo, which has been stressing safety since it began building cars in 1927, is not overly concerned about competition from Honda.

“We have no plans to give up safety to Honda or anyone — we have an 80-year jump on them,” said Dan Johnston, a spokesman for Volvo Cars, who said Volvo was “flattered” by Honda’s efforts…

Honda’s me-too brand strategy will not work in expanding their audience unless they frame the safety dialogue in an entirely new way to the consumer. More than a slogan or advertising campaign, the safety claim must become a difference ownable to the exclusion of all competitors.

As the safety position is owned by Volvo, Honda is left with an ineffective adulatory message rather than effective brand strategy.

The adulatory message? An instantly forgettable “We are safer than Volvo.”

Read more here.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Differentiation]

The Brand Promise

A respected CEO talks of the importance of brand promise, in this from China Daily:

Philips logo“You need to have a promise in the brand to your customers,” said Gerard Kleisterlee, chairman and CEO of Royal Philips Electronics, whose brand value has risen by more than 50 per cent since it began repositioning in 2004.

Good advice for any CEO, as also shared here, and here.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Promise]

Strong Brands, Little Advertising

A recent column in Advertising Age makes a point worth revisiting:

[During this year’s] Black Friday…many retailers seemed to go to new lengths to offer the deepest discounts…

ToysRUsThe Sports Authority had “6-hour doorbusters,” with 25% off its entire stock. Toys “R” Us offered “Lowest prices ever” with 50% off and more. Sears featured “Insanely early Friday Specials.” The first 200 customers in each store got a free $10 reward card…

The day a chain starts down the continuous sale path is the day the chain is headed for trouble…

Strong brands do little sale advertising. I have never seen a Starbucks‘ ad offering two cappuccinos for the price of one. Nor have I seen an Apple ad offering half off on an iPod. Or have I seen a Rolex ad offering two watches for the price of one.

On Thanksgiving Day when all the other retailers were running their sale, sale, sale advertisements, Whole Foods ran an ad in…newspaper[s] with the headline: “Today we give thanks to all our local growers.”

That’s class. And that’s a powerful brand.

When a company’s brand shouts to the market little else than sale or low price or rebate, for the consumer it becomes impossible to determine what the brand stands for. And you can bet no one will stand around to ponder the answer. When that happens, when the consumer has no mental meathook by which to remember the brand doing the advertising, watch out. One need only look to brands such as Wal-Mart, Ford Motor, or United Airlines to survey the results.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Branding vs Advertising]

Branding a Newspaper: The Los Angeles Times

The Los Angeles Times, the second largest metropolitan newspaper in the United States, is owned by the Tribune Company [NYSE:TRB], which also owns other publishing and broadcast media assets, including the Chicago Cubs major league baseball franchise.

LATimes logo 2Facing competitive pressures, Tribune is attempting to determine how best to unlock the value of its assets to grow the value of the company. At the same time, the L.A. Times is like many daily newspapers facing declining paid circulation figures.

But there is hope. That hope comes in Tribune rethinking how it might own the conversation in the marketplace by demonstrating a unique difference, planting a flag in the sand and standing for that difference. It’s called branding.

This column in the L.A. Times offers a roadmap of how Tribune might rethink the strategy behind the brand known as the L.A. Times, and how that could play into a repositioning of all it’s daily newspaper assets:

Los Angeles is the capital of the increasingly dominant infotainment-media-celebrity complex. Broaden your scope to California generally and you can throw in high technology as well. The L.A. Times should be the diary of this capital.

We agree, to a point. Rather than standing for three points of difference — as the dairy of the infotainment-media-celebrity complex, California, and the hi-tech industry — the L.A. Times should stand for only one; the entertainment industry. By owning the conversation about the entertainment industry, the L.A. Times becomes the intuitive, reflexive and first answer for those seeking information about the industry, globally. Achieve this and mark an easy to see competitive separation, creating for The Times a sustainable competitive advantage.

As with any effective brand positioning, you must give up something to gain market share. Exit the role of a traditional metropolitan paper. Leave that lower margin role to others, focusing instead on becoming THE media authority of the entertainment industry, anywhere in the world. To implement this brand strategy, the L.A. Times should rethink their business operations to align with a vision as the entertainment industry expert.

Yes, rich traditions would disappear with such a brand strategy. Eight years after his death, a sports section today still associated with Pulitzer Prize winning sportswriter Jim Murray would no longer exist. Likewise, terrific Times sections on travel, food, and local news would no longer be as prominent and might altogether vanish.

However, a far greater opportunity would emerge. The opportunity to own a market position in which the Los Angeles Times is capable of demonstrating leadership everyday, to a national and global audience rather than a finite, local one. Hollywood Such a positioning maps to the strengths of the L.A. Times brand, and how the market associates it with another well known brand, Hollywood.

The Times today stands for a good, even excellent, metropolitan newspaper. The problem with such a positioning is there are many good metropolitan newspapers within metropolitan Los Angeles. Instead, the brand could provide an unforgettable answer to the question, Why Should I Care About You? as, of course, the entertainment industry authority.

Running in the opposite direction of the competition, a perhaps initially uncomfortable strategy, would create a powerful engine for growth of the L.A. Times brand, and increase Tribune shareholder value, while addressing a market need.

Isn’t that the point of effective brand strategy?

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Media Branding]

Playing It The Safeway

A Fortune 50 company announced an agency review and at the same time cut loose it’s long time ad agency, in this press release:

Safeway logoSafeway Inc. (NYSE:SWY), one of the largest food and drug retailers in North America, announced today that it will conduct a competitive review of advertising agencies for its $250 million account. The business up for review includes broadcast creative, strategic planning, broadcast media planning and buying, and promotional marketing.

No real news here, as companies conduct ad agency reviews everyday. But then the Safeway release offers this nugget:

The review coincides with the one-year anniversary of the company’s brand positioning launch of “Ingredients for life.” This brand positioning has distinguished Safeway within food retailing, is grounded in consumer insights, and has allowed Safeway to add true brand marketing to the traditional mix of retail promotional activities. [Emphasis ours.]

Safeway’s marketing team confuses brand positioning with an advertising slogan. The Safeway slogan, Ingredients for Life, is not at all a brand position, nor does it distinguish the company within food retailing, except in the minds of those who sit in the Safeway boardroom.

The slogan fails to satisfy a number of the Laws of Branding. For example, a functional message such as Ingredients for Life is easiest for competitors to claim or duplicate. The slogan offers no human engagement, but rather reads as a chapter to a grade school science text. It all points to the obvious: a slogan is not a brand.

Labeling Ingredients for Life as a brand is a demonstration of how even a $38 billion dollar company full of otherwise certified smart people skip the hard part of brand creation, and develop instead a forgettable ad campaign reinforcing a slogan rather than a brand.

So, the results of the Safeway agency review to “further differentiate the Safeway brand”? They hired another ad agency.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Advertising Campaigns]


« Home | Brand Positioning