brand strategy consultants

category: Brand Grad School

Whisper | A Brand Demonstration

We are often asked of the origin of our name.

Whisper is our brand name, the name of our company, a reflection of our brand promise and a demonstration of effective branding.

The story behind the creation of our own brand demonstrates how we think of brand opportunities faced by most any organization and more importantly how, by turning to us, an organization may solve them.

Whisper was created to assist and guide companies through what are often complex issues of brand evaluation, brand creation and brand deployment.

In addition to the usual struggles of getting the positioning pitch perfect—the marketing industry is so large and the lines between advertising, public relations, graphic design, and branding are so often blurred, we knew finding a “between-the-eyes” audience connection would be vexing.

We relied upon storytelling.

The 5-Second Story

The key was to develop an entry point into the minds of those we seek to attract and influence—an effective 5-second story—to prompt a mental stop allowing further engagement in a real conversation about their needs and how we would address them.

Our 5-second story had to instantly induce our audience to pause and internalize the story, prompting a desire to “pay” to hear more—literally “paying” when they pay attention, paying with their time and mental effort.

Whatever our 5-second story might be, it had to offer something new and authentic, a never heard before narrative. Ours had to offer the equivalent of electric shock therapy to snap preconceptions about the discipline of branding, providing a now we’re paying attention moment for our firm to frame itself. Because such preconceptions are strong and not easily brushed aside, the audience needs to come away questioning their assumptions, their stereotypes, as if to say, “THIS is branding? Wow, I had no idea.”

Playing By The Rules

Our story had to demonstrate how to successfully play by the rules.

World class brand strategy honors certain inalienable rules. These rules, or Laws of Branding, cannot be ignored or dismissed IF a brand creation exercise is to be successful.

Ignore the Laws of Branding, and any so-called “branding effort” devolves into a far more expensive advertising campaign of little long term effect.

It is one thing to advocate certain laws, and not follow them. Our brand had to demonstrate how an adherence to the rules, through an effective process discipline, creates a successful brand.

Positioning, Positioning, Positioning

Whether creating a new brand or rebranding an established one, a branding project is really a positioning project—first develop the brand positioning, then name that positioning. Since branding is about demonstrating ideas and advertising is about explaining them, we needed a market position that demonstrated rather than explained the Why of our firm. The brand name also had to work on a multinational, cross-cultural basis.

The best means of engaging a consumer is through a one-on-one communication. It’s intimate. It’s personal.

Getting inside the head of your consumer is the objective. This personalized intimacy is far more credible and effective than any mass media in building a long-term relationship.

To drive this engagement, great brand positioning results in a tip-of-the-spear name and often tagline, the crucial first point of audience contact for any organization, product, or place.

Smarter than Advertising

Our business objective was to develop a brand position leading to a name and tagline driving awareness—without the support of advertising dollars. We were, after all, a start-up business. As with any entrepreneurial venture, we had to make every dollar count.

Our brand had to open a window into the minds of organization decision-makers we seek to influence, who when finding us on the Internet or by word-of-mouth are moved to ask for more about us and how we work.

A brand position demonstrating an intuitive reason to learn more about us would tap into stories and layers of imagery existing within the human mind.

Branding Is Competitive Sport

We developed a competitive analysis, necessary to understand the competitive context of any brand. What names and key messages are owned by competitors, and how effective are they?

While many firms say they offer branding services, their brand names and key messages do not demonstrate storytelling expertise.

For example, consider firms with names such as Wolff Olins, Landor, Prophet, MarketShare Partners, Brandtrust, GSD&M, Interbrand, or FutureBrand. What do those names convey? Is it:

    • A law firm?
    • Cigarette?
    • Venture capital group?
    • Alphabet soup?
    • Trucking company?
    • An indefinite time forever unreachable, a promise forever unfulfilled?

Each name misses the tip-of-the-spear opportunity to demonstrate competitive difference, and must be explained before understanding the “why” of the organization the name represents.

None map back into the fundamental basis for the existence of the branding discipline—communication.

Naming Narcissism

There is another, often counterintuitive, consideration. A brand name should turn the focus away from the organization or product it represents, and instead serve as an introduction to the benefit a customer may receive.

Rather than a chest thumping brand name blaring “Me, Me, Me”—for example, a founder’s last name, or a presumptively self-flattering capability such as Prophet—a name should intuitively tap into a benefit of significance to the intended audience.

The principle is basic to human behavior and response. For example, at a social gathering one creates far more goodwill by speaking in terms of interest to others, rather than the tiresome bore who speaks constantly of himself.

Building the Customer Relationship

As our competitive analysis revealed, no brand consultancy had yet developed a self-propelling evocative brand name. This result pointed to our market opportunity, further defined as assisting clients in thinking of brand as an asset rather than expense, and brand development as a powerful and cost-efficient customer relationship tool.

Like many others in our business, the intellectually lazy way out of naming ourselves would have been to use the last names of our founding partners — Cranford, Manning & Jurisch — or by an acronym such as CMJ. However, founder-based brand names are chosen primarily to stroke the egos of the founders, and demonstrate a complete lack of strategic thought.

We might also have chosen a functional name such as BusinessBrand, invented name such BrandFly, non-English name such as Sermo (Latin for conversation), or an experiential name such as CompetitiveAdvantage Partners. However, whether a functional, invented or experiential brand name, none offer the self-propelling emotional imagery and narrative creating natural, and inevitable, human engagement.

When the human mind discovers an instinctive solution properly labeled, the discovery serves as a prompt for the mind to stop, lean forward, examine closely, and seek more information. Accomplish this, and a brand name shows up daily and goes to work without advertising.

Breakthrough

Rather than positioning our brand with a built-in need to explain our relevancy, we zeroed in on this thought, “The key to any effective marketing or branding effort is to change and take ownership of the conversation.”

Marketing today is often little more than the equivalent of shouting on a street corner, with the shouters believing the loudest win. When you shout, people tune you out.

In a culture saturated with messages being screamed at consumers from every direction, employing superlatives like “best”, “number one”, “leading”, “favorite”, “great”, “unique”, and so on, it’s no wonder that people have evolved highly sensitive and effective BS indicators.

When you whisper, on the other hand, people are forced to pay attention, to lean forward, to become engaged. To whisper is to exchange valuable, privileged information, to communicate intimately, emotionally and strategically, and to make yourself heard as human rather than as a product, all without yelling yourself hoarse.

Competitive Separation

Branding must create long-term competitive advantage to increase market share. Otherwise, what’s the point?

Our process pointed to a brand position that could get us inside the mind of our target audience and keep us there. This position would demonstrate a different mindset and approach, and tap into a wealth of existing imagery. It would penetrate the human mind by successfully navigating the white noise of marketing industry self-promotion, and frame the answer to “Why we exist” as one of personal one-on-one immediacy.

Following the same process we use with clients, we had no choice but to name our company Whisper. The name moves across borders easily, creating engagement whether in the United Arab Emirates, or the United States. And because our positioning is all about looking at branding as balance sheet asset creation, by changing and taking ownership of the market conversation to grow market share, it became obvious our tagline should be Own The Conversation.

One of the most important accomplishments of the best brands is being thought of as greater than the functional goods and services offered. “Nike - Just Do It” helps the company rise above selling sneakers. “Apple - Think Different” taps into far more than computers. “Las Vegas - What Happens Here, Stays Here” is bigger than a vacation destination.

These breakthroughs lead to a transactional narrative where the organization, product, or place speaks for itself.

As for Whisper, we don’t think there’s a better name out there demonstrating branding thought leadership.

And that’s our story.

It’s a strategy validated many times since by, among others, this futurist and author.

Turning To You

You should always have the highest expectations for your brand, and the story you share.

When looking for a partner to assist in developing your own brand, and the best means to attract the audience you seek to engage, ask yourself:

How did the firm I am considering brand themselves?

The insight gained from the answer will prove invaluable, IF you are unwilling to settle for incrementalism for building the reputation of your organization, and if you seek the fullest development of your brand assets and the opportunity to grow market share.

Let’s talk about your story, and how to own the conversation within your industry.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Naming]

Brand Trust An Oxymoron?

Are the concepts of brand and trust contradictory? Charles Green of Trusted Advisor Associates ponders this and related questions:

What’s the difference between trust and branding? Or are they the same? Is Brand Trust an intuitively meaningful term? Or an oxymoron?

While the folks at Brandtrust may recoil from a characterization of the phrase brand trust as an oxymoron, these are valid questions, particularly as we see a direct link between great branding and truth telling.

Green suggests that branding be considered “in terms of [his] Trust Equation: a mix of credibility, reliability, intimacy, and low self-orientation.”

So, the real question becomes: do we or do we not trust the people behind the brand? Do we believe in the integrity of the organization putting out the product or service? Do those people in that company really believe what they say? Do they mean for their product to serve us? Or could they just as well be in currency trading or reinsurance as well as whatever they’re doing, because they’re just in it for the money?

That makes sense to me. In the traditional, personal sense of trust, I trust a brand because of what I believe about the people branding it…

Then Green offers this, the money quote:

Branding may be the social version of the individual connection we call trust. It’s accessibly meaningful in narrow senses like reliability. And, it can have that personal meaning when it comes to the authenticity and trustworthiness of those behind the curtain—the ones charged with delivering the brand.

We could not agree more.

Rather than an oxymoron, branding at its best is all about developing trust.

The outcome of effective branding confers upon a product or place a very human ability to rely upon — to trust — a haloed reputation in selecting among competing choices.

Green’s idea that branding is the social version of personal connection commonly referred to as trust is extendable.

One example. Recently we were asked to explain the differences between the branding of a product, and of branding a place, in this instance a city.

Our answer — there is no difference as both engage in efforts to attract and influence people — may have surprised our questioner, as authorities and consultants with assumed expertise often claim a difference, on occasion confusing advertising with branding.

However, places are like companies — those with effective branding find it easier to sell their products, services and experiences, and easier to attract people and investment.

As with a product, a place can offer personal meaning when it comes to the authenticity of those behind the curtain—those charged with delivering on the experience of a place.

As Green suggests, it’s all about trust.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Reputation]

CEOs Take Note: Branding Is Big Business

Brands and branding are big business.

A handful have clearly understood this truth all along.

Now another respected voice is saying the same thing, in this from Brands in the Boardroom: Key branding issues for senior executives, a publication of Intellectual Asset Management Magazine:

The world’s most famous brands have values that can be measured in tens of billions of dollars –real sums that can be realised through securitisation and other methods of monetisation. You need only look at the interest generated today by techniques for calculating brand value to see that brands are now recognised as corporate assets to be audited and managed along similar lines as a company’s more traditional, tangible revenue generators. Employers, investors and other stakeholders expect those running companies to understand the major principles that drive and sustain brand value: after all, we are talking about what can often be the single most important asset a corporation owns.

We agree.

There is more, of course:

Without question, a brand’s ability to communicate an instant message to target audiences is where much of its power and value lie. A strong brand instils trust in consumers, making them feel confident that the choice they are making offers them high levels of consistency and quality. And a strong brand needs to have an identity and a personality that can be protected in all markets where its owners operate or may wish to do so in the future.

Could not have said it better ourselves.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Asset]

Great Branding By Truth Telling

We are fans of Trust Matters, the respected blog hosted by Charles Green of Trusted Advisor fame.

A Trust Matters commentary, Great Selling By Truth Telling: A Best Buy Tale, should be required reading for those who think branding is simply “advanced” advertising, a stereotype captured in this quote:

[S]ome people feel this is a sucker’s game. It’s sales right? The point isn’t to tell the truth, it’s to not get caught not telling the truth? To look like you’re telling the truth, not to actually tell it.

Market research reveals some 75 percent of Americans disbelieve and distrust advertising.

As Charles Green frames it:

Telling the truth is not stupid, wussy, or bad business. Far from it. It’s very good business.

We agree. Telling the truth — authenticity — is one requirement of effective branding.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Branding vs Advertising]

The Cost of Getting Branding Wrong Is Higher Than The Expense of Doing It Right

Canada’s Financial Post says successful branding is difficult work, and suggests “the cost of getting this wrong is usually much higher than the expense of doing it right.”

Financial Post LogoWe agree.

So much so that this principle becomes our latest Law of Branding.

Here’s more of the story appearing in the Financial Post:

Last week Hewlett-Packard Canada unveiled a survey of 1,225 small and medium-sized business owners in which 55% defined “brand” as their product or company name, and 29% said they thought it was their logo.

In reality, branding is everything you do… It’s not just a logo or a line of shampoos — it’s the entire experience.

Canada’s entrepreneurs may not know what branding is, but they do know they’re not good at it. Only 45% of business owners polled by HP Canada say they are “very satisfied” with their company’s current brand. Yet, 59% of them say they consider branding a priority! Sadly, such disconnects are not rare…

As with any good discussion of the topic, the Financial Post offers this definition of branding:

“…[D]efining why you are, so that you become the only logical choice for what you offer.”

A definition with which we also agree.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Branding Definitions]

Committees Can Kill Even the Greatest Idea

Beware the committee approach in creating a breakthrough brand.

Committee ArtFor our latest Law of Branding, we turn to this from Karen Post:

A by-product of brands “for the people” is the committee that compromises and kills potential brand home runs. That is why you never see statues of committees in parks; you see brave leaders.

Adam Hanft, author of Dictionary of the Future, notes, “There is no question that multiple levels of government, etc. militate against a successful branding campaign. When the strategy and advertising become dumbed down so that it satisfies bureaucrats and ends up as self-serving pabulum, it’s destined to die.”

The way around this is for leadership to take control and say, “Listen, while some issues demand creating a consensus, this is one area where a consensus will fail.” What might be helpful is to show resistors the kind of advertising that works in today’s culture and how a city that wants to brand itself as cool must rise to that level.

The same is true, of course, for committees in any organization. Including a Fortune 500.

Successful branding begs for insightful leadership.

It also often requires expert support skilled in the brand development process, and in process discipline.

Otherwise, any branding effort devolves to this, or this, or this.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Laws of Branding]

Anais Nin on Branding

Anais Nin was a Cuban-French author who became famous for her published journals. Years before branding emerged as a business topic, Ms. Nin offered this insight:

We don’t see things as they are, we see them as we are.

In creating an engaging brand, the process of branding must reveal things as they are, rather than as how a brand’s owner sees them. For many organizations and their CEOs, this concept remains an often difficult, counterintuitive, and yet essential idea to grasp.

As demonstrated in the following links, the market is littered with examples of otherwise certified smart people who failed in this understanding.

Before the emergence of the contemporary discipline of branding, in addition to Ms. Nin there were some who intuitively understood this basic principle, each ahead of their time.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Research]

Popcorn’s Brand Imitation

“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery,” or so said 19th century English writer Charles Caleb Colton.

The latest example:

Faith\'sPopcornShhhh. Longtime futurist and author Faith Popcorn warns that optimism is passé and brands that trumpet their benefits are hopelessly out of tune with consumers who are sick and tired of marketing’s noise. …Popcorn explains why she advises marketers…to build their strategies around whispers and honesty rather than hype and shouts.

We like what Faith has to say because, well, we first said it some years ago:

Advertising is a shout. Branding is a whisper.

She offers more in this Q&A with AdWeek:

Adweek: Please explain what you mean by branding in whispers?
Popcorn: It is not boasting how great your products are, but showing how your brand can help people.

Hmmm. Faith again demonstrates her ability to look into the future by restating and offering as new this authority published in 2004:

Branding is demonstrating, advertising is explaining. What you fail to demonstrate, you are left to explain.

More imitation may be read at this link.

I guess we are, ah, flattered.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Branding vs Advertising]

A Logo Is Not A Brand, But Interesting Nonetheless

Ferrari Horse LogoFrom the UK, The Independent today offers a history of select logos that have become ubiquitous in global contemporary culture.

Included are the stories behind the icons that go to work daily for Ferrari, Nike, Lacoste, McDonald’s, Apple and Chanel.

Good weekend read.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Identity]

The Illustrated Difference Between Branding and Advertising and PR

Courtesy of our friend in South Africa, the following from the book Zag, an accurate demonstration of the differences between marketing, public relations, advertising and branding:

ZagMarketing

Zag_PR

Zag_Advertising

Zag_Branding

The book includes two additional panels in this series. In one labeled “Telemarketing” the woman answers a phone to hear the man as telemarketer say “I’m a great lover.” The other is labeled “Graphic Design,” in which the image of a heart floats above the man’s head, illustrating that a logo is not a brand.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Branding vs Advertising]

The Poorest Consumers Are The Most Brand Loyal

Former Unilever CEO, now Chairman of Reuters, Niall FitzGerald, says the poorest consumers are the most brand loyal. In a speech delivered during the Business in Africa symposium at CASS Business School in London, he offered these comments:

Unilever has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Africa. Why? For the same reason it is investing in Europe, Asia, Latin America and North America: to do business, grow and make money.

The poorest consumers are the most brand-loyal consumers. They cannot afford to make a mistake with meagre incomes. There is no second choice. If your brand earns trust, it will be rewarded with fierce loyalty. You enter a real contract with your consumer. Deliver for them and they will stick with you.

Tell us what you think.

You can read more about Mr. FitzGerald’s comments and their context in this report from The Times.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Strategy]

Eskom Demonstrates Rather Than Explains

The most effective brands demonstrate their value, knowledge and understanding of consumer wants and needs rather than explaining themselves.

An example of the difference between a demonstration and explanation comes from Eskom, a South African electricity supply public utility:

EskomBillboard

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Demonstration]

Brand Strategy IS Business Strategy - A Second Opinion

Brand strategy is business strategy, or so this startling (to some) opinion was offered in this column.

Another voice now offers the same opinion in a column titled Marketers Can’t Afford To Promise and Then Not Deliver:

A brand is not a graphic design. It is—I should say it must be—a business strategy. But so often, if the strategy was ever there (as it truly was at FedEx and Starbucks), it gets lost in the idea that a whammo ad campaign can carry the company, can take the place of the promise.

Read more in this from Brandweek.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Strategy]

Would You Hire a Branding Company Unable to Brand Itself?

Unfortunately, many organizations do. Those making the agency hiring decision often overlook a common sense test of a branding company’s branding skills raised by this question:

“Tell us, how did you brand yourself, and how does your own name and branding demonstrate your ability to help us with ours?”

The latest branding company to fail in rebranding themselves is the topic of this story in Advertising Age.

BrandUnion logo2The agency? Formerly Enterprise IG, now The Brand Union, positioning themselves as full of brand mastery with this new logo.

The new brand name and positioning becomes instantly anonymous among other branding companies with these blindingly similar names:

Brand-DNA (.com)
Brand-DNA (.net)
DNA Brand Mechanics
Brand 2.0
BrandActive
Brand Doctors
Brand Equity
Brand Evolve
Brand Fidelity
Brand Institute
Brand Mechanics
BrandForward
Brandico
Brandjuice Consulting
BrandLadder
BrandLink
BrandLogic
BrandMaverick
BrandPeople
Brandscope
Brandslinger
BrandSolutions
Brandtrust

And these:

Absolute Brand
Building Brands
Core Brand
Futurebrand
Independent Branding
Interbrand
Not Just Any Branding
Real Branding
Spherical Branding
The Branding Iron
The Brand Consultancy
The BrandRanch
The Brand Union
TradingBrands
The Better Branding Company

There is an easy tip-off of why the new “The Brand Union” name and position are failures before they begin. If the word brand is used in the name and positioning of a so-called branding company, the company demonstrates an unwillingness to differentiate itself from brand company competitors. If undifferentiated from the competition, a brand devolves into little more than an anonymous commodity — the worst possible outcome for any brand.

One executive with The Brand Union explains the change this way:

“It suggested strength through the organization and common goals. It was a clear identifier — especially coming from Enterprise IG, where there was a lot of ‘What do they do?’”

An executive with The Brand Union’s parent offers a revealing look into how this branding company thinks:

The relaunch will help the company be more competitive in the marketplace, where his research suggests that potential clients turned to rivals such as FutureBrand and Interbrand due to their more-appropriate corporate names.

There is a lesson in this beyond poking fun at a competitor. The message to potential corporate clients anywhere is if you want what seems safe, yet is bland and instantly forgettable, hire The Brand Union or any of the homogeneous branding companies identified above.

However, if unafraid to explore what works in creating a game changing company or product name, check out this from our sister naming group, Igor, and give us a call.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Brand Naming]

A Brand Tutorial

We came across an interesting series of columns appearing in Realty Times, an online news site directed to the real estate industry. Although for real estate professionals, the columns offer a street level tutorial on branding of application to organization leaders in any industry, including these gems:

Marketing is not branding

Marketing is not branding.

These two concepts are easily and often confused, but they are not the same. Sending out direct mail and placing ads in the newspaper…are all examples of marketing. Marketing is about a quick response. You are sending out direct mail or placing a classified ad because you want people to act on your product…

Branding, by contrast, is…designed to pre-sell you to your customers.

Public Relations is not Branding

Organizations often undertake a “branding” process, yet the outcome closely resembles a public relations face-lift. Why does this occur? One possibility might be the framework that guides the process. Another may simply be the viewpoint of the agency, or consultant, employed. In any case, valuable dollars are spent each year on brand strategy endeavors and frequently, the outcome does not yield the tangible results organizations are seeking.

Brand Promise

Branding is about your promise to your customers - what service will you provide that no other…can or will?

When developing your brand, review it by asking yourself, “What does this promise to my customers?” If it promises nothing, it’s time to get back to the drawing board…

Your marketing and advertising dollars should reflect your brand…its promise and your target.

The Best Brand Strategies Last

[T]he best brands stand the test of time. Ideally your brand should remain the same. Think about package brands you know. Coca Cola, Ford Motor Company, McDonalds-their brands, their logos have remained the same. These are brands that are recognizable whether written in English, Chinese, or Hebrew.

If an organization truly seeks to create, develop and extend a brand, work with an accomplished brand consultancy. Otherwise one is left with an advertising, public relations, or logo design strategy, none of which build brand reputation for the long haul.

[More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More posts about | More blogs about Professional Services Branding]


« Home | Brand Grad School